ASUS ProArt PA32UCG-K vs BenQ SW272Q

By Billy G. · Founder & Lead Editor

ASUS ProArt PA32UCG-K
ASUS ProArt PA32UCG-K
BenQ SW272Q
BenQ SW272Q
Verified Confidence: 89%

Verdict: For photographers and video professionals who need true HDR 1000 mastering and the brightest accurate panel for high-end production, the PA32UCG-K justifies its price. For most professional photographers and retouchers, the BenQ SW272Q delivers professional-grade color accuracy at a fraction of the cost.

Winner: BenQ SW272Q

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ProArt PA32UCG-KBenQ SW272Q
Size32"27"
HDRDisplayHDR 1000 (FALD, 1152 zones)SDR only
Peak Brightness>1100 nits HDR250 nits SDR
Color Gamut99% DCI-P3, ~89% Rec.202099% AdobeRGB, 100% sRGB
Delta E< 2 (factory calibrated)< 2 (factory calibrated)
Price~$2500~$700

ASUS ProArt PA32UCG-K

What works

  • DisplayHDR 1000 with 1152 FALD zones
  • Thunderbolt 4 connectivity
  • Rec. 2020 and DCI-P3 coverage for video mastering

What doesn't

  • $2500+ price is prohibitive for most buyers
  • Very large and heavy (32")
  • Overkill for non-HDR work

BenQ SW272Q

What works

  • ~$700 vs $2500+ — 3.5x lower price
  • 99% AdobeRGB for professional photography
  • Hot-key puck controller

What doesn't

  • No HDR capabilities — SDR only
  • 250 nits typical — dim in bright rooms
  • Only 27" — smaller workspace

Bottom line

Our pick: BenQ SW272Q. It edges out the alternative on ~$700 vs $2500+ — 3.5x lower price. That said, ASUS ProArt PA32UCG-K still wins on displayhdr 1000 with 1152 fald zones — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons