Alienware AW3225QF vs LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

Alienware AW3225QF
Alienware AW3225QF
LG UltraGear 32GS95UE
LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

Verdict: Alienware AW3225QF has the brighter, more saturated HDR; LG 32GS95UE offers the 4K/1080p dual-mode and better value at its typical selling price.

Winner: Alienware AW3225QF

Alienware AW3225QF: 7.5/10

LG UltraGear 32GS95UE: 6.8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Alienware AW3225QFLG UltraGear 32GS95UE
Panel TechQD-OLED Gen 3 (Samsung)WOLED (LG)
Resolution / Refresh4K 240Hz4K 240Hz / 1080p 480Hz
Response Time (GtG)0.03ms0.03ms
Peak Brightness (3%)~1,300 nits~1,050 nits
DCI-P3 Coverage99.3%98.5%
HDR CertDisplayHDR True Black 600DisplayHDR True Black 600

Alienware AW3225QF

What works

  • QD-OLED Gen 3: ~1,300 nits peak (3% window) vs LG's ~1,050 nits
  • 99.3% DCI-P3 — superior color saturation on HDR highlights
  • DisplayPort 2.1: uncompressed 4K 240Hz (no DSC)

What doesn't

  • 4K 240Hz only — no high-refresh lower-res option for competitive play
  • $1,100–1,200 retail — $150–250 premium over LG
  • QD-OLED subpixel structure can show slight fringing on fine white text

LG UltraGear 32GS95UE

What works

  • Dual-mode: 4K 240Hz or 1080p 480Hz — unique flexibility
  • $150–250 less than Alienware at typical retail
  • Same DP 2.1 and HDMI 2.1 inputs — matched connectivity

What doesn't

  • ~1,050 nits peak vs Alienware's ~1,300 nits — measurably less HDR punch
  • 98.5% DCI-P3 vs 99.3% — lower color volume at high brightness
  • 1080p 480Hz mode uses pixel binning — softened image vs native 1080p panel

Bottom line

Our pick: Alienware AW3225QF.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons